Cisco CCNP Collaboration CLCOR (350-801) · Domain 3 · 30% of exam

On-Premises Call Control

Drill 20 practice questions focused entirely on On-Premises Call Control for the Cisco 350-801 exam. Tap an answer for instant feedback and a full explanation — no sign-up, always free.

Verified answer20 questions
Question 1 of 20

A UCM administrator configures two route patterns for an international customer: '9.011!' for international dialing and '9.[2-9]XXXXXXXXX' for domestic 10-digit calls. Users report that when they dial international numbers, the call is delayed by about 15 seconds before it actually connects. Domestic calls route immediately. What is the MOST likely cause of the delay, and what should the administrator do to fix it?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 2 of 20

A CCNP engineer is reviewing the CUCM dial plan after auditing found unexpected international calls originating from the auto-attendant/IVR ports. Investigation shows external callers reached the IVR, then used a menu option that performed a call transfer to an external number the IVR passed dynamically. The service parameter 'Block OffNet To OffNet Transfer' is currently set to False. Which single service parameter change most directly prevents an incoming off-net (external) call from being transferred back out to another off-net destination through CUCM?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 3 of 20

A CCNP engineer is configuring globalized call routing on Cisco UCM. Inbound PSTN calls arrive on a SIP trunk with the calling number in national format (e.g., 4085551234 for a US number). The engineer wants the calling number displayed on phones as a +E.164 number so that missed-call directory entries can be dialed back directly. Which UCM configuration element should be applied on the inbound side to convert the incoming national calling number into +E.164 format?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 4 of 20

A CCNP Collaboration engineer is deploying globalized call routing across a multinational Cisco UCM cluster. All internal routing uses +E.164 in a single global partition. An inbound PSTN call arrives on a gateway in the London site with the called party number '02071234567' (national format for a UK DID). The engineer needs the call to route to the destination phone, whose DN is provisioned as '+442071234567'. Where should the engineer apply the transformation to convert the incoming national number into +E.164 before digit analysis?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 5 of 20

A CUCM administrator has configured two route patterns in the same partition: 9.[2-9]XXXXXX (a 7-digit local pattern) and 9.[2-9]XXXXXXXXX (a 10-digit pattern). A user dials 9 followed by 5551234, but the phone waits about 15 seconds before the call is finally routed. Users complain about the delay on 7-digit local calls. What is the cause of this behavior, and what best resolves it?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 6 of 20

A company wants to restrict access to expensive international dialing so that only authorized employees can place these calls, while still allowing them from any phone in the building. Rather than restricting the route pattern to a specific device pool or partition, management wants each user to enter a personal PIN before the call completes, with the code logged to CDR for accounting. Which Cisco UCM feature should the engineer configure on the international route pattern to meet this requirement?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 7 of 20

A global enterprise uses globalized call routing with all internal directory numbers and route patterns normalized to +E.164. A user in the Chicago site dials a national number that resolves to +19725551234. The administrator wants the call to egress via the Dallas gateway to take advantage of Tail-End Hop-Off (TEHO), but if the Dallas WAN or gateway is unavailable, the call must fall back to egress out the local Chicago PSTN gateway. Which configuration approach correctly achieves this behavior?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 8 of 20

An administrator has configured LDAP synchronization in Cisco UCM to import users from Active Directory. LDAP Authentication has NOT been enabled. A newly synced end user reports they cannot log in to the Self-Care Portal using their Active Directory password. What is the most likely reason?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 9 of 20

An administrator configures LDAP synchronization on Cisco UCM against a corporate Active Directory. After the first sync completes, only about 40% of the expected users appear in End User Management, and several important departments are entirely missing. The LDAP directory configuration points to the correct base DN at the domain root, and authentication to AD succeeds. What is the MOST likely cause of the incomplete user population?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 10 of 20

An administrator integrates Cisco UCM with the corporate Microsoft Active Directory. After configuring and running an LDAP directory synchronization, end users are imported successfully and appear in the End User list. However, when users try to log in to the Self-Care Portal using their AD password, authentication fails, while a local admin account still works fine. What must the administrator configure to resolve this?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 11 of 20

A global enterprise uses globalized call routing in Cisco UCM. All PSTN calls are normalized to +E.164 and routed through a single route pattern that points to a route list containing a Standard Local Route Group. A user in the Singapore site places a call to a local Singapore number. The call correctly matches the global route pattern, but it egresses through the US gateway instead of the Singapore gateway. What is the most likely cause?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 12 of 20

A collaboration engineer configures a SIP trunk from Cisco UCM to a partner PBX for interoffice dialing. Users complain that certain calls to the partner site are rejected with a SIP 483 Too Many Hops response, even though the destination is reachable. The engineer confirms the route pattern and partition are correct, and that the partner PBX forwards some calls back through UCM when its local users are unavailable. Which mechanism is preventing these calls from completing, and what is its purpose?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 13 of 20

A user in the Chicago office reports that when they dial the 4-digit extension 4001 for a colleague in the same site, the call is routed to a different device with a conflicting overlapping pattern. Both the local site pattern (partition CHI-Internal) and a corporate pattern (partition CORP-Shared) match the dialed digits. The Chicago phone's line CSS lists partitions in this order: CORP-Shared, CHI-Internal. Which statement best explains the routing behavior and how UCM selects the matched pattern?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 14 of 20

A CCNP engineer is deploying a new CUCM cluster. Executive phones must be able to call any internal or PSTN destination, while shared lobby phones may only reach internal extensions and local emergency numbers. Both phone types are assigned the same device pool. The engineer wants to grant executives broader dialing rights than the physical phone itself allows, without changing the device pool. Using the line/device calling search space approach, which configuration achieves this requirement?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 15 of 20

An engineer configures a Cisco UCM cluster and needs a specific IP phone line to reach both internal extensions and PSTN numbers. The phone's device-level CSS contains only the 'Internal_PT' partition, while the line-level CSS contains 'Internal_PT' and 'PSTN_PT'. A user reports the phone can call internal extensions but cannot dial any PSTN number. What is the most likely cause and correct behavior of UCM CSS processing here?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 16 of 20

An engineer reviews a Cisco UCM deployment and notices that several route patterns for international dialing (9.011!) were configured but left in the <None> partition. Gateway devices and some phones have a Calling Search Space that does not explicitly list any partitions. During a security audit, calls from these phones are successfully reaching international destinations even though the intended dial plan should restrict them. What is the root cause of this behavior?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 17 of 20

Users at a branch site report that calls to a newly provisioned 4-digit internal extension range (5XXX) sometimes route to voicemail instead of ringing the target phones. The dial plan administrator wants to observe, in near-real time, exactly how Cisco UCM performs digit analysis for these calls—including which partition and pattern are matched and whether inter-digit timeout is triggering premature routing. Which Cisco monitoring tool and approach should the administrator use to capture this live digit-by-digit analysis behavior?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 18 of 20

A collaboration engineer is integrating Cisco UCM with a third-party SIP application server. Calls destined for the SIP domain 'partners.example.com' must be sent out a specific SIP trunk to that server, while all numeric dialing continues to use the existing route patterns. Which UCM configuration element should the engineer create to route calls based on the SIP domain to the correct SIP trunk?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 19 of 20

A CUCM administrator configures globalized call routing but notices that when an internal user dials a directory URI (user@company.com) from a Jabber client, the call fails while dialing the same user's DN succeeds. SIP route patterns for other external domains work correctly. What is the MOST likely cause of the directory URI call failure?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue
Question 20 of 20

A developer is building an automated onboarding tool that must create end users, associate them with a device profile, and update the user's primary extension in Cisco UCM. The tool needs to perform these configuration changes programmatically and receive confirmation of success or a structured fault if the operation fails. Which Cisco UCM API should the developer use to perform these write operations?

Reviewed for accuracy · Report an issue

More 350-801 practice

Keep going with the other Cisco CCNP Collaboration CLCOR (350-801) domains, or take a full timed mock exam.

← Back to 350-801 overview